Coates v. Locust Point Co.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Baltimore City Court (Wright, J.) • The cause was-argued before McSHEkRY, C. J., Briscoe, Boyd, Schmucker, Jones and Burke, JJ.
1Opinion of the CourtBoyd, J.
This suit was instituted to recover commissions for the sale of a lot of ground in the city of Baltimore claimed to have been made by the appellant for the appellee. The defendant plead the Statute of .Limitations in addition to the general issue. The first bill of exceptions presents the ruling of the Baltimore City Court on an offer of certain evidence, and the-second contains a prayer granted by the Court, at the conclusion of the plaintiff’s evidence, which' instructed the jury that the plaintiff had offered no evidence legally sufficient to entitle him to recover upon the pleadings, and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kimberly v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1868
- Banks v. McCosker & MolloyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1896
- Leupold v. WeeksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1903
3Cited by12 opinions
- Goldsmith v. Manufacturers' Liability InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1918
- Riggs v. TurnbullCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1907
- Kendrick & Roberts, Inc. v. Warren Bros.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
- Patterson v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Toole v. Wiregrass Development Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1914
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.