Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Patton v. Marron

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1917No. Nos. 2073, 2074Published

Original proceeding in contempt by State of New Moxicoo on tbe relation of lí. L. Patton, Attorney General, against Owen N. Marrón and Francis E. Wood.

1Dissent 1

DISSENTING OPINION.

2Dissent · Eobert'SEobert'S, J.

The state, on the relation of its Attorney General, instituted separate proceedings against each of the above named respondents for the purpose of punishing them for contempt of court. As the charges against each respondent are predicated upon a violation of the same order and the facts are somewhat -identical, I will treat the two cases in one opinion. The respondents were, prior to the 23d day of September, 1916, members of the bar of this state, regnarly admitted to the practice of the law in this court, and were practicing their profession in the city of Albuquerque.…

3Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ketchum v. . EdwardsNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Danforth v. EganSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  3. State v. SwanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
  4. In re BaileyMontana Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Coffin v. CoffinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API