Legal Opinion

Harrison v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 19, 2015No. 14-705CPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pro Se Plaintiff; Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction; Presidential Management Fellows Program.

OPINION

HORN, J.

FINDINGS OF FACT

Pro se plaintiff Nicholas Harrison 1 filed a complaint in this court. As the basis for this court’s jurisdiction, plaintiff cites the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1491 (2012) and asserts “employment rights in contract.” In his complaint, plaintiff states that he “was induced to take a position with the U.S. Small Business Administration [SBA] as part of the Presidential Management Fellows Program [PMF Program].” Plaintiff indicates he “was offered the position on June 20,…

2Cases cited94 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Diaz v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
  2. Lambro v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
  3. Ward-Johnson v. GlinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API