Legal Opinion

Dayton Hudson Department Store Company v. National Labor Relations Board

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 1, 1993No. 91-6197PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

987 F.2d 359

142 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2585, 124 Lab.Cas. P 10,600

DAYTON HUDSON DEPARTMENT STORE COMPANY, A DIVISION OF DAYTON

HUDSON CORPORATION, Petitioner/Cross-Respondent,

v.

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent/Cross-Applicant,

International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, and

Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Intervenor.

Nos. 91-6197, 91-6314.

United States Court of Appeals,

Sixth Circuit.

Argued Aug. 11, 1992.

Decided March 1, 1993.

Joseph Ritok, Jr. (briefed), Lauren A. Rousseau-Rohl (briefed), Timothy K. Carroll (argued and briefed), Dykema & Gossett, Detroit, MI, for…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Savair Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Golden Age Beverage CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Bostik Division, Usm CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  4. Van Dorn Plastic MacHinery Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  5. Tony Scott Trucking, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Keeler Die Cast, Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (Uaw), Afl-Cio, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API