Legal Opinion
M&T Bank v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided August 6, 2019No. 2:17-cv-01867Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 * * * 7 M&T BANK, et al., Case No. 2:17-CV-1867 JCM (CWH) 8 Plaintiff(s), ORDER 9 v. 10 SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, et al., 11 Defendant(s). 12 13 Presently before the court is defendant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC’s (“SFR”) emergency 14 motion for temporary restraining order. (ECF No. 106). Plaintiffs M&T Bank and Federal Home 15 Loan Mortgage Corporation (“Freddie Mac”) (collectively “plaintiffs”) filed a response (ECF No. 16 108), to which SFR replied (ECF No. 110). 17 Also before the court is SFR’s emergency motion for…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Stormans, Inc. v. SeleckyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Angela Bernhardt v. Los Angeles County Lloyd W. Pellman, Individually and in His Official CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. San Diego Baykeeper, Inc. Kenneth J. Moser v. Southwest Marine IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.