Legal Opinion
Sausalito Pharmacy v. Blue Shield of California
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 16, 1981No. C-78-2196 RFPPublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PECKHAM, Chief Judge.
Defendants in this antitrust action have moved this court for summary judgment on the issue of their liability under Section 1 of the Sherman Act and the corresponding section of the Cartwright Act. This court, having heard oral argument on the motion on December 22, 1980 and having fully con sidered all matters herein, decides to grant the motion with respect to all defendants in the action. In addition, defendant Blue Shield renewed its motion for summary judgment on the grounds that its agreements are exempt from the antitrust laws under the state…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Board of Trade of Chicago v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- American Key Corporation, and Ron Deweese v. Cole National Corporation, and Sears, Roebuck and Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Dr. Donald J. Barry and Dr. Bert Hassler v. Blue Cross of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Kartell v. Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- Royal Drug Company, Inc., Etc. v. Group Life and Health Insurance Co., Etc., Group Life and Health Insurance Co., Etc. v. Royal Drug Company, Inc., Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Dr. James R. Brillhart v. Mutual Medical Insurance, Inc., D/B/A Blue Shield of Indiana, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.