Legal Opinion

Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Zerpa

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 29, 2020No. 4:19-cv-02791Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 INNOVATIVE SPORTS MANAGEMENT, Case No. 19-cv-02791-HSG INC., 8 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND Plaintiff, DENYING IN PART MOTIONS FOR 9 PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT v. 10 Re: Dkt. No. 36, 37 PEDRO ZERPA, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 Pending before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for partial summary judgment for 14 which briefing is complete. Dkt. Nos. 36 (“ISM Mot.”), 37 (“FPG Mot.”), 38 (“ISM Opp.”), 40 15 (“FPG Reply). Plaintiff Integrated Sports Management, Inc. d/b/a Integrated Sports Media 16 (“ISM”) initially…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Shakur v. SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Keenan v. AllanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API