Legal Opinion

State v. Scaife

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 14, 2000No. C5-99-1769PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge.

Appellant State of Minnesota challenges the trial court’s imposition of a stay of adjudication. Because the required special circumstances for such a stay did not exist, we reverse.

FACTS

Respondent James Scaife’s driving privileges were cancelled in April 1997, apparently due to a driving while intoxicated (DWI) approximately 15 to 20 years ago in Wisconsin. In September 1997, Scaife was stopped for driving after cancellation. Scaife failed to appear at his initial pretrial date, a warrant was issued and executed, and Scaife then appeared on August 16, 1999, for a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. KrotzerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  2. State v. FossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  3. State v. ThomaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  4. State v. TwissSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. OhrtCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  2. State v. LemingCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  3. State v. AngottiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  4. In re the Welfare of J.J.P.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
  5. State v. AngottiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API