State v. Rombolo
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On error to the Hudson Oyer and Terminer.
1Opinion of the Court
*561The opinion of the court was delivered by
Garrison, J.
The plaintiff in error having been convicted of murder in the first degree brings up with liis writ of error a certification of the proceedings under the statute. The first point argued is that the accused suffered manifest wrong or injury from the denial of his motion for the withdrawal of a juror made after the close of the state’s case.
The motion was as follows:
“Mr. Dougherty — I make a motion for an order of mistrial, on the ground that Mr. Black, who is a juror in this trial, was also a juror in the previous trial, and, of course,…
2Cited by9 opinions
- City of Salem v. Oregon-Washington Water Service Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1933
- DeLaine v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
- State v. EngelsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
- State v. ThenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
- State v. EngelsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.