Legal Opinion

Hardin v. Nicholas

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 1, 1954No. 35308PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

In passing upon the question of whether or not the court rightly awarded a nonsuit, the evidence must be construed most strongly in favor of the plaintiff’s right to recover. National Land & Coal Co. v. Zugar, 171 Ga. 228 (2) (155 S. E. 7). “A motion for nonsuit presents only the question of whether the plaintiff has proved his case substantially as laid, and where, under the most favorable construction, a prima facie case has been made out, the grant of a nonsuit is error. Henry v. Roberts, 140 Ga. 477 (79 S. E. 115); Box v. Atlantic & B. R. Co., 120 Ga. 1050 (48 S. E. 427).” Reese v. Bice,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clark v. BandySupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  2. National Land & Coal Co. v. ZugarSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  3. Henry v. RobertsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  4. Box v. Atlantic & Birmingham RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  5. Reese v. BiceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Few v. Automobile Financing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  2. Phillips v. SheaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  3. Few v. Automobile Financing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  4. Phillips v. SheaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API