Legal Opinion

Brown v. Kay

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 9, 2012No. 11 Civ. 7304 (PAE)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge:

This case involves claims relating to the art collection of the late Himan Brown (“Himan”), a well-known producer of radio and television programs. Plaintiff Barry Brown (“Barry”) is Himan’s long-estranged son. Barry brings claims of fraud *472and conversion against the executor of Hi-man’s estate (“the Estate”) and against two trusts created by Himan. In essence, Barry alleges that Himan subverted a provision of a long-ago separation agreement under which Himan and his ex-wife had provided that, upon the death of the latter of the two of them,…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. ATSI Communications, Inc. v. Shaar Fund, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  5. Hicks v. BainesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. De Sole v. Knoedler Gallery, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  2. Lesesne v. BrimecomeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  3. Martin Hilti Family Trust v. Knoedler Gallery, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  4. Duff & Phelps, LLC v. Vitro S.A.B. de C.V.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  5. Fischer v. Brushy Mountain Bee Farm, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2023

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API