Legal Opinion

Brewer v. Furtwangler

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1933No. 24355. Department OnePublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

While an unintentional trespasser upon the defendants’ land, plaintiff was attacked and seriously injured by a vicious dog owned by the defendants. This action was instituted to recover for the personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff. The trial of the cause to a jury resulted in a verdict for twenty-six hundred dollars, which was reduced by the trial court to eighteen hundred dollars, in favor of the plaintiff. From judgment on the reduced verdict, the defendants have appealed.

Appellants admit that the dog was vicious, and that they knew the dog was vicious. They concede the cor rectness…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lander v. ShannonWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Eberling v. MutillodSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1917

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Johnston v. OhlsWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Bramble v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  3. Arnold v. LairdWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Sligar v. OdellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  5. Sligar v. OdellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API