Legal Opinion
Tate v. Hain
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided April 26, 1943No. Record No. 2649PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Per curiam
The opinion of the trial judge, which follows, sufficiently states the issue and the reasons which support the decree complained of, and, therefore, it will be affirmed.
“The Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, its Home Office being in the City of New York, issued four policies of insurance on the life' of Joseph Halberstadt, all providing that payments to the beneficiaries were to be made at its Home Office.
“No. 830032-A was issued on March 22, 1912, had a face value of $2,000 and was payable to Joseph Halberstadt on the 22nd day of March, '1969, if he were then living, and if not, to Bessie…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Central Trust Co. of Ill. v. Chicago Auditorium Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Hutchison v. RossNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Eaton v. Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- International Harvester Co. of America v. McAdamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
- Shannon v. Irving Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1937
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Peugeot Motors of America, Inc. v. Eastern Auto Distributors, Inc., Peugeot Motors of America, Inc. v. Eastern Auto Distributors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- Hitachi Credit America Corp. v. Signet BankCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- George Hengle v. Sherry TreppaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
- Hooper v. MusolinoSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
- Tattoo Art, Inc. v. TAT International, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2010
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.