Legal Opinion

Bickham v. Kelly

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 31, 1926No. 26271PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRogers, J.

Plaintiff sues to rescind the sale of certain real estate made to her by the defendant; for the return of the amount paid on account of the purchase price; to cancel the notes representing the unpaid portion of the purchase price; and to recover the amount paid -by her for taxes and improvements on the property. Plaintiff alleges, as her cause of action, that there were outstanding interests in said property owned by the Texarkana, Shreveport & Natchez Railroad Company, by J. M. Hoss, Jr., and by Mrs. W. H. Elder, an interdict; that she did not intend to purchase an undivided interest in said…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bonvillain v. BodenheimerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
  2. Brewer v. New Orleans Land Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
  3. Hall v. NevillSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1848
  4. Robbins v. MartinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1891
  5. McDonold & Coon v. VaughanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1859

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Parish of Jefferson v. Texas Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
  2. Bologna Bros. v. StephensSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1944
  3. Hausler v. NuccioSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
  4. Abney v. LevySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
  5. Greer v. SumneyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1949

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API