Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Gove v. Tate

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 14, 1969No. 54151PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEILER, Judge.

This is an original action in prohibition. The question is whether the respondent judge would be exceeding his jurisdiction if he proceeds to enter an order of condemnation in an action brought by the city of Linn, a city of the fourth class, to acquire an easement across the property of relators for the construction, maintenance and operation of a sewer line, approximately four feet beneath the surface.

The answer is yes, for two reasons: First, on the record before us, there is no ordinance authorizing the city to proceed with the condemnation action. There is only a resolution…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kansas City v. HydeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  2. City of Hannibal v. WinchesterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  3. Julian v. Mayor, Councilmen and CitizensSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  4. City of Tarkio v. ClarkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  5. McGrew v. Granite Bituminous Paving Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Aaron v. Target CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
  2. State Ex Rel. Weatherby Advertising Co. v. ConleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  3. City of St. Joseph v. Village of Country ClubSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
  4. State Ex Rel. Devanssay v. McGuireMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. City of Gainesville v. GillilandMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API