Legal Opinion
Boardman Co. v. Clark
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 14, 1933No. 24412PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBayless, J.
Homer Clark, hereinafter called claimant, while employed by Board-man ¡Si Company, hereinafter called petitioner, whose insurance was carried by United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, received an accidental personal injury February 1, 1929, arising out of and in the course of the employment, resulting from a guy wire which he was handling coming in contact with another wire carrying 66,000 volts of electricity.
The petitioner immediately gave notice to the State Industrial Commission of the accident and of the fact that it was paying compensation and furnishing medical attention. The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Texas Co. v. RobertsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. AllredSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- United States Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Industrial Track Construction Co. v. ColthropSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Stanolind Pipe Line Co. v. HudsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
3Cited by14 opinions
- Barnsdall Oil Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Brown Bros. v. ParksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Texas Co. v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Fox v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Nuway Laundry Company v. HackerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.