Legal Opinion

Stanolind Pipe Line Co. v. Hudson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 11, 1933No. 23802PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OSBORN, ,T.

This is an original action in this court to review an award of the State Industrial Commission in favor of J.' H. Hudson and against the Stanolind Pipe Line Company.

The record shows that claimant was employed by petitioner as a roustabout in the oil field and that on July 17, 1927, while carrying a piece of pipe with another employee of the company, the other employee dropped his end of the pipe, and that when it fell the force knocked claimant • down and the pipe fell on his back and side and that he sustained severe bruises. It appears that on August 2d, 1927, his injury was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. AllredSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  2. Graver Corporation v. State Industrial Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Industrial Track Construction Co. v. ColthropSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. Wise-Buchanan Coal Co. v. RaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cornhuskers Theatres, Inc. v. FosterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  2. Boardman Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  3. Murch Bros. Construction Co. v. CuppSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. Keck v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. Skelly Oil Co. v. GoodwinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API