Woolridge v. Boardman
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Placer County denying a new trial. J. E. Prewitt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Britt, C.
A. F.Boardman and William Watts, individually, and as partners composing the firm of A. F. Boardman & Co., filed their petition in insolvency on the twenty-eighth day of March, 1895, and were thereupon duly adjudicated insolvent debtors; subsequently plaintiff was elected their assignee. As such assignee he obtained judgment in this action requiring the defendant, Mary Boardman, wife of said A. F. Boardman, to reconvey to him, the plaintiff, nine hundred and ninety shares of stock in a certain mining corporation, of the value of two thousand nine hundred and seventy dollars, which…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Butler v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- San José & Almaden Railroad v. MayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Windhaus v. BootzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Elwell v. WalkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
3Cited by5 opinions
- County of Los Angeles v. MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Ohio Electric Car Co. v. DuffetCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Buhl State Bank v. GlanderIdaho Supreme Court · 1936
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Spotswood v. SpotswoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907