Legal Opinion

Kuehl v. Hoyle

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 9, 2001No. 49A04-0004-CV-164PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARNES, Judge.

Case Summary

This appeal stems from the trial court's denial of Melissa Kuehl's "Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint" in her suit seeking damages for injuries sustained in an automobile accident. We affirm, but deny General Casualty Company of Wisconsin's ("General Casualty") request for appellate attorney fees.

Issues

The restated issues for our review are:

I. whether the trial court erroneously denied the motion to amend; and

II. whether General Casualty is entitled to appellate attorney fees.

Facts

On December 12, 1990, Kuehl and James Hoyle were involved in an automobile…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Shideler v. DwyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Mishler v. County of ElkhartIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
  3. A.J.'s Automotive Sales, Inc. v. FreetIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Transcontinental Insurance Co. v. J.L. Manta, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Comer v. GohilIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Smith v. Indiana Department of CorrectionIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Tioga Pines Living Center, Inc. v. Indiana Family & Social Services AdministrationIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Porter County Sheriff Department v. GuzorekIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Reed Sign Service, Inc. v. ReidIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Parks v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API