Alston v. Black River Electric Cooperative
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1DissentAnderson, Judge
I respectfully dissent. The majority concludes jurors who are members of an electric cooperative, which is a party to the suit, are eligible to serve as jurors, subject to a challenge for cause in the particular case. I disagree.
ISSUE
Should South Carolina adopt a per se rule of disqualification from jury service for members of an electric cooperative who is a party to the case?
LAW/ANALYSIS
Fundamental to our system of courts is the tenet that litigants are guaranteed a fair and impartial jury. See Brown v. S.H. Kress & Co., 170 S.C. 178, 170 S.E. 142 (1933). South Carolina Code Ann. §…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Grady Paul Chestnut v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
- State v. ThomlinsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
- Bookhart v. Central Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
- Lamar Electric Membership Corp. v. CarrollCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Ozark Border Electric Cooperative v. StacyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.