Legal Opinion
Runser v. City of Waterville
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided April 12, 1976PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ARCHIBALD, Justice.
On appeal by the defendant.
The City of Waterville (City), in the exercise of its power of eminent domain, acquired title to certain premises owned by the plaintiffs who, acting pursuant to Rule 80B, M.R.C.P., sought a review of the damages awarded by the City. The parties agreed to a reference, reserving the right to object to the report of the referee. A hearing was held, resulting in a report finding damages totaling $31,400.00. The report was accepted by a Justice of the Superior Court, over objection, who ordered judgment for the plaintiffs in accordance with the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Department of Transportation v. GalleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
- Iowa-Wisconsin Bridge Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1949
- In re the City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Balog v. State, Department of RoadsNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
- Taylor v. Portsmouth, Kittery & York Street RailwaySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1898
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lerman v. City of PortlandDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1987
- Runser v. City of WatervilleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995