Wilbanks v. North American Coal Corp.
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
BARBOUR, District Judge.
This cause is before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion-to Remand and Plaintiffs Mo tion for Recovery of Attorney’s Fees. Having considered the Motions, Responses, Rebuttals, supporting and opposing memo-randa, and attachments to each, the Court finds that the Motion to Remand is well taken and should be granted. Additionally, the Court finds the Motion to Recover Attorney’s Fees and Costs is not well taken and should not be granted.
I. Factual Background and Procedural History
This cause of action involves a vehicular collision. Plaintiff in this case…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Barbara Allen v. R & H Oil & Gas Company, Farrar Oilfield Service and Equipment Co., and Tri-State Oil Services, Inc., Tri-State Oil Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- De Aguilar v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Adrian Cavallini v. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Asociacion Nacional De Pescadores a Pequena Escala O Artesanales De Colombia (Anpac) v. Dow Quimica De Colombia S.A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mabry v. Government Employee's Insurance Co.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2017
- JHohman, LLC v. United States Security Associates, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2007
- Lee v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2005