Legal Opinion

Since Hardware (Guangzhou) Co. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided April 28, 2016No. Slip Op. 16-42; Court 09-00123Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION and ORDER

EATON, Judge:

Before the court are the objections of plaintiff Since Hardware (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. (“Since Hardware”) to the United States Department of Commerce’s (“the Department” or “Commerce”) Fourth Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand (Second Corrected Version) dated June 18, 2015 (ECF Dkt. No. 202-2) (“Fourth Remand Results”). On remand, Commerce was instructed to demonstrate why the rate of 157.68 percent assigned to Since Hardware based on adverse facts available (“AFA”) was relevant to the company and reflected its commercial reality, or to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rhone Poulenc, Inc. And Rhone Poulenc Chimie De Base, S.A. v. The United States, Pq CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  2. F.lli De Cecco di Filippo Fara S. Martino S.p.A. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  3. Timken Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  4. Gallant Ocean (Thailand) Co., Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  5. Ad Hoc Shrimp Trade Action Committee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API