Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Pankey
Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)
Decided August 31, 1992No. 12-92-00102-CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BILL BASS, Justice.
This is an appeal from a dismissal of Dan Thomas’ pro se petition against the Appel-lees, who are correctional officers at the Michael Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice — Institutional Division. We will affirm.
In his petition, Thomas alleged that: on 1/24/92 at 7:00 A.M. [appellees] did willfully, unlawfully in arbitrary manner deny plaintiff an hour of out of cell exercise, and daily shower as mandated by formal prison directive no. #0350 and Ruiz v. Estelle, # H-78-987-CA. Defendants knew that plaintiff wanted to participate in his shower and out of cell…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Smith v. McCorkleTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Prunty v. Arkansas Freightways, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- R.W. Rogers, Sr. v. Arletha Garland Franklin, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2008
- R.W. Rogers, Sr. v. Arletha Garland Franklin, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2008
- R.W. Rogers, Sr. v. Arletha Garland Franklin, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2008