Legal Opinion

Perry v. Taco Bell Corp.

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided August 20, 2009No. Case 07-2579Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT/THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE THE EEOC FROM INTRODUCING EVIDENCE OR TESTIMONY CONCERNING CHANDRA PERRY

BERNICE BOUIE DONALD, District Judge.

Before the Court is Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff Taco Bell Corp.’s (“Taco Bell”) Motion in Limine to Preclude the EEOC from Introducing Evidence or Testimony Concerning Chandra Perry. (D.E. # 95.) Plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) has filed a response in opposition (D.E. # 106), and Taco Bell has sought leave to file a reply, which the Court has granted (D.E. # 125). Taco Bell then…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Waffle House, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Plaintiff-Appellant. v. McLEAN TRUCKING COMPANY Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  4. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. LA Weight LossDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2007
  5. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Dayton Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API