Legal Opinion

Capital Income Properties-LXXX v. Waldman

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided July 30, 1992No. 13-92-219-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Appellees, Robert S. Waldman, and other investors, sued appellants, Capital Income Properties-LXXX, and other parties (collectively Capital), for fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, negligent misrepresentation, and violations of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practiees-Consumer Protection Act (the DTP A). After appellees filed suit, Capital filed its “DEFENDANTS’ CONSOLIDATED MOTION TO DISMISS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO ABATE THE PRO CEEDINGS AND COMPEL ARBITRATION OF THIS DISPUTE” (Motion to Compel). The trial court entered an order denying the motion. Capital has attempted to appeal from…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. North East Independent School District v. AldridgeTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Cherokee Water Co. v. RossTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Schlipf v. Exxon Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
  4. NCR Corp. v. Mr. Penguin Tuxedo Rental & Sales, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1983
  5. Warranty Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Lara, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Capital Income Properties-LXXX v. BlackmonTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Al's Formal Wear of Houston, Inc. v. Sun, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993
  3. American Physicians Service Group, Inc. v. Port Lavaca Clinic Associates, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API