Capital Income Properties-LXXX v. Waldman
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Appellees, Robert S. Waldman, and other investors, sued appellants, Capital Income Properties-LXXX, and other parties (collectively Capital), for fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, negligent misrepresentation, and violations of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practiees-Consumer Protection Act (the DTP A). After appellees filed suit, Capital filed its “DEFENDANTS’ CONSOLIDATED MOTION TO DISMISS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO ABATE THE PRO CEEDINGS AND COMPEL ARBITRATION OF THIS DISPUTE” (Motion to Compel). The trial court entered an order denying the motion. Capital has attempted to appeal from…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- North East Independent School District v. AldridgeTexas Supreme Court · 1966
- Cherokee Water Co. v. RossTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- Schlipf v. Exxon Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
- NCR Corp. v. Mr. Penguin Tuxedo Rental & Sales, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1983
- Warranty Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Lara, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.