Legal Opinion
Ringstad v. Grannis
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided October 17, 1947No. 5357PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRATT, District Judge.
This is an action in ejectment wherein the plaintiff based her right upon adverse possession. The jury found against the plaintiff, and a motion for a new trial was interposed.
In her Second Amended Complaint, as further amended by interlineation upon the 6th day of June, 1947, the plaintiff, hereinafter sometimes called Mrs. Ringstad, alleged that she was the owner of Lot 3, Block 95, Fairbanks Townsite, Alaska. She further alleged that defendants have been trespassing upon the south 75 feet of said lot.
After the statement that plaintiff was the owner of said Lot 3, she…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Lessee of Ewing v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
- Sharon v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Bendernagel v. ForetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
- Joy v. StumpOregon Supreme Court · 1887
- Robin v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lott v. Muldoon Road Baptist Church, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1970
- William W. Karvonen v. John DyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- Lott v. Muldoon Road Baptist Church, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1970