William W. Karvonen v. John Dyer
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES ALGER FEE, Circuit Judge.
This is an action to quiet title and for recovery of real property, which Karvonen claims to own by adverse possession but record title to which is vested in Dyer. A complaint was filed consisting of two causes of action. The answer contained denials, an affirmative defense and a counterclaim.
The case was tried to the judge sitting with a jury. At the close of the evidence presented by Karvonen, the judge directed a verdict for Dyer on the two causes of action in the complaint and for Karvonen on the counterclaim.
The genesis of the controversy can be shortly…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Martin TiegerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
- Ringstad v. GrannisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
- Pacific Coal & Transportation Co. v. Pioneer Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1913
- Green v. TrumbullNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
- Pacific Coast Co. v. JamesDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ayers v. Day and Night Fuel Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1969
- Hubbard v. CurtissAlaska Supreme Court · 1984