Legal Opinion
John J. Carden, A/K/A James J. Carden, and Gloria (Eusek) Carden v. State of Montana
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 8, 1980No. 78-3095PublishedCited by 340 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FARRIS, Circuit Judge:
The State of Montana is appealing from the district court’s grant of appellees’ pretrial petition for habeas corpus. The district court found that appellees John and Gloria Carden had been denied their constitutional right to a speedy trial and that habeas relief was proper because the Car-dens had exhausted their state remedies. We reverse.
I. FACTS
The Cardens were charged with crimes related to Gloria Carden’s $5,000 worker’s compensation award. The information was filed on December 20, 1974. Because of a lengthy procedural delay caused by the actions of both the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Perez v. LedesmaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Albert Moore v. John Deyoung, Warden, Passaic County Jail, and Frank Davenport, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by340 opinions
- In Re Justices of the Superior Court Department of the Massachusetts Trial CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Sammy Page v. Audrey KingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Walck v. EdmondsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Brown v. AhernCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Sherwood v. TomkinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
335 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.