Roberts v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion
ON REHEARING.
June 17, 1914.
PBEHDEBGAST, Presiding Judge.
Appellant has filed quite a lengthy and very vigorous motion for rehearing. He presents only some of the points he originally contended for. We will discuss such of them as we deem of sufficient importance.
He, in no way, in the court below contended or intimated that the verdict of, and within itself, was fundamentally or otherwise void. Heither does he raise the question in his motion for rehearing herein, nor his argument in his motion for rehearing by his original attorneys. For the first time, by additional attorneys in this court,…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- People v. . BrooksNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Exon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1894
- Brock v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1902
- Hamilton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
- Sue v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1907
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.