Legal Opinion

People v. Long

California Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1898No. Crim. Nos. 402 and 405PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPEAL by the people from orders of the Superior Court of Riverside County sustaining demurrers to two several indictments for perjury. J. S. Noyes, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.

These two appeals involve the same questions, presented upon facts in all respects similar. Each is taken from an order sustaining a demurrer to an indictment for perjury.

There are no bills of exceptions in the transcript, and respondents make the point that there are here no records upon which the appeals can be heard.

There does not seem to be any judgment-roll or record in a criminal case except upon conviction. (Pen. Code, sec. 1207.) It is by virtue of that section only, making the minutes of the court a part of the judgment-roll, that the minutes get into and become a part of the record…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. McPhersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  2. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  3. People v. DruffelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
  4. People v. SchultzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  5. State v. GemmellMontana Supreme Court · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API