Legal Opinion

People v. Hooker

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 11, 1955No. Crim. 5238PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

Appellants were convicted of having committed assault (under two counts) by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury. (Pen. Code, § 245.) Their motion for a new trial was, by order, duly denied and judgment was entered, remanding them to the custody of the California Youth Authority. They appeal from both the order and the judgment on the grounds of the insufficiency of the evidence and errors of law.

Evidence Sufficient

While the proof consisted of the testimony of many witnesses, the ultimate facts impliedly found from the total evidence is substantially as follows. Appellants,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. People v. DabbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. People v. FerdinandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. People v. HorowitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. People v. ChessmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. FinleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. People v. AndrusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. State v. PierreCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  4. People v. PierreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. State v. PierreCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API