Legal Opinion

In re Duncan

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 5, 1951No. 126PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By MILLER, J:

This is a law appeal from a judgment of the Juvenile Court for Preble County finding Judith Ann Duncan to be a dependent child'. Thé complaint specified certain facts upon which the allegation of dependency was based and at the outset of the hearing counsel for appellant moved that the complaint be dismissed for the reason that the allegations, even if proved, would not constitute a dependency under §1639-4 GC. This motion was overruled by the trial court, citing §1639-23 CG, which makes the complaint sufficiently definite by the simple use of the word “dependent.” We are…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re HockOhio Court of Appeals · 1947
  2. Smith v. Privette & StateOhio Court of Appeals · 1932

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Application of GaultArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  2. In Re DarstOhio Court of Appeals · 1963
  3. In Re the Appeal in Pima County, Juvenile Action No. J-46735Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API