Legal Opinion

Smith v. Privette & State

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 9, 1932No. 2204PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BY THE COURT

Many interesting questions are urged, well presented and well briefed by counsel. We believe, however, that this case may be determined upon one proposition.

It is doubtful if the affidavit alleging that Katherine Privette is a dependent minor states facts which, if true, constitute a charge of dependency against the minor.

It would seem unnecessary to state that the fact that a child is an illegitimate child would not constitute a dependent child under the statute. No such ground appears and it would be the height of inhumanity to read such a provision into our law. It is true that…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re BurkhartWarren County Juvenile Court · 1968
  2. In re DuncanOhio Court of Appeals · 1951
  3. In re HayesOhio Court of Appeals · 1938
  4. In re HobsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API