Legal Opinion

In re Tanenbaum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 26, 1939PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarswell, J.

Moses Tanenbaum, in 1898, was a widower with two children. He married the petitioner Clara Tanenbaum on March 20,1898. There was no issue of that marriage. The husband and wife separated. They executed a separation agreement on June 22,1928. It provided inter alia that the husband should pay the wife $1,500 a month during their joint lives. The wife agreed, in effect, to release her dower in a parcel of Manhattan real property owned by the husband. His only other parcel, in Irvington, was not included in that requirement. The husband agreed to keep in full force $100,000 of life insurance of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hermann v. LudwigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  2. In Re the Estate of BurridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  3. Hermann v. . LudwigNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. In Re the Appraisal Under the Transfer Tax Act of the Estate of KiddNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  5. Morgan v. . SanbornNew York Court of Appeals · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of HoytNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940
  2. In re the Estate of GrayNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941
  3. Shimp v. HuffCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  4. In re the Accounting of LewisNew York Surrogate's Court · 1953
  5. In re the Estate of UllmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API