Legal Opinion
US Bank, N.A. v. Hough
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided May 22, 2012No. A-82/83 September Term 2010 067029Published
1Opinion of the Court 1
42 A.3d 870 (2012)
210 N.J. 187
US BANK, N.A., Plaintiff-Appellant and Cross-Respondent,
v.
Nikia HOUGH, Defendant-Respondent and Cross-Appellant, and
Mr. Hough, Husband of Nikia Hough; New Jersey Department of Community Affairs; Council on Affordable Housing; Township of Piscataway; New Jersey Housing and Mortgage Finance Agency; State of New Jersey; and the Commons at Piscataway, Inc., Defendants.
A-82/83 September Term 2010 067029
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued November 7, 2011.
Decided May 22, 2012.
Diane Bettino argued the cause for appellant and cross-respondent (Reed Smith, attorneys; Ms.…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Albin; Dissent.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Manalapan Realty v. Township Committee of the Township of ManalapanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- DiProspero v. PennSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- In Re TaylorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v. Township of Mount LaurelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v. Township of Mount LaurelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.