Legal Opinion
Varga v. Woods
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided January 29, 1986No. 14675PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HENDERSON, Justice.
ACTION
This is a strict foreclosure action. It is made complicated by the cross-claims herein and creative financing. We have abridged the briefs so as to reduce an already technical and confused record. An appeal from Judgments entered on cross-claims against Robert Gray (Gray), appellant-defendant and cross-defendant herein, was perfected. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand. Essentially, we hold for Gray, who borrowed money and bought a motel by assuming a Contract for Deed, and then assigned, transferred, and delegated his interests and obligations to one…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- American Property Services, Inc. v. BarringerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Zastrow v. KnightSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
- North Bank v. Circle Investment Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- Western Petroleum Co. v. First Bank Aberdeen (N.A.)South Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Associated Press v. Heart of the Black Hills Stations, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Wolff v. Secretary of the South Dakota Game, Fish & Parks DepartmentSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- In Re Trasks' CharolaisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Dakota · 1988
- Grynberg Exploration Corp. v. PuckettSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- First Dakota National Bank v. MaxonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. KaarupSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.