Bane v. Dow
Washington Supreme Court
Cross-appeals from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Gilliam, J., entered September 12, 1913, upon findings favorable in part to the plaintiffs, in an action on contract, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.
The parties to this action are custom house brokers, respondents doing business at New York City, and appellants at Seattle. In February, 1903, respondents, claiming to control certain importing business of New York merchants passing through the port of Seattle, wrote to Frank P. Dow, who was then doing business as an individual, suggesting they would obtain this business for Dow upon consideration of an equal division of fees. Dow accepted this offer, and respondents then informed him that the business to be turned over was that of Morimura Brothers. As fixing the terms of the contract…
2Cited by9 opinions
- San Francisco Iron & Metal Co. v. American Milling & Industrial Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
- State ex rel. Ratliffe v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1919
- Eagle-Picher Co. v. Mid-Continent Lead & Zinc Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
- Kaufman v. CatzenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1925
- Rains v. WalbyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.