Legal Opinion

Hillegass v. F. v. Warren & Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 8, 1933No. Appeal, 349PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Mehl & Latta, a corporation engaged in the retail lumber and building supplies business, appeals from a decree of the Court of Common Pleas No. 1 of Philadelphia County, declaring an assignment, made to it by W. Palmer Young less than four months before his adjudication as a bankrupt, to be a preference and setting it aside as void under the provisions of section 60 of the Bankruptcy Act. Plaintiff is a trustee of the estate of the bankrupt, Young, who was a contractor and builder in Bryn Mawr, Montgomery County. The assignment in question, made November 23, 1931, was of moneys due…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Belmont Laboratories, Inc. v. HeistSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Schuette v. SwankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Locke v. Provident Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pearlman v. NewburgerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. Stern v. GorsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API