Legal Opinion
Francilia Padilla v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 1, 2003No. 02-70430PublishedCited by 92 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge GRABER; Concurrence by Judge BERZON.
GRABER, Circuit Judge:
Petitioner Francilia Padilla attempted to enter the United States using fraudulent documents and was removed pursuant to an expedited procedure that does not afford a hearing. She reentered illegally. After she applied for an adjustment of status, the Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”) reinstated the prior removal order pursuant to another expedited procedure that does not afford a hearing. She sought review of the reinstatement, arguing that the prior order was reinstated in violation of her right to due…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Juan Mario Arrieta, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Ojeda-Terrazas v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Ruben Gomez-Chavez v. Brian Perryman, District Director, and Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Ramon Ramirez-Alejandre v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
3Cited by92 opinions
- Zetino v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Todor Krumov Simeonov v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Raul Morales-Izquierdo v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Mohammed Subhan v. John D. Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Gonzales v. Department of Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.