Legal Opinion

Burks v. Whalen

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 11, 1971No. 46,093PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Foth, C.:

The issue presented to the trial court was whether the driver of a truck was using it with the implied permission of his employer at the time he was involved in a collision, so as to bring his use of the truck within the coverage of the “omnibus clause” of the employer’s liability insurance policy.

The suit originated as one against both John P. Whalen and Field Queen, Inc., his employer and owner of the truck, for damages sustained by plaintiffs as a result of the collision. On motion for summary judgment it was determined that Whalens…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gibbs v. Central Surety & InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  2. MacKey-woodard, Inc. v. Citizens State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  3. Waterstradt v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  4. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance v. DennisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  5. In Re Estate of EwersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gangel v. BensonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  2. Baker v. R. D. Andersen Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1982
  3. Armstrong v. City of SalinaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  4. Nutt v. KnutsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1988
  5. Alliance Mutual Casualty Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API