Legal Opinion

Continental Illustrating Co. v. Longley Motor Sales Co.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided June 15, 1921PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Assumpsit.

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

This is an action of assumpsit and is now before the court on the plaintiff’s bill of exceptions. After a trial in the Superior Court the jury returned a verdict for the defendant; the plaintiff then duly filed a motion for a new trial which was denied by the trial justice.

The action is based upon a written order signed by the defendant ordering plaintiff to ship to it, “52 cuts . . ■ . and reading matter for our exclusive use for one year in advertising the auto supply business in the city of Pawtucket, State of R. I. only.”

The order is dated July 24, 1919, and "was accepted by the…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Russo Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
  2. Bjartmarz v. Pinnacle Real Estate Tax ServiceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
  3. Hawkins v. SmithSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1969
  4. Fiorito v. Clyde Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924
  5. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Russo Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API