Legal Opinion

Mark Mancini v. City of Providence

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided March 8, 2017No. 2014-88 (13-92 S)PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice Robinson,

for the Court.

This case comes before us pursuant to a September 26, 2013 order of the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island certifying a question to this Court in accordance with Article I, Rule 6(a) of the Supreme Court Rules of Appel late Procedure. 1 The certified question reads as follows:

“Does Section 28-5-7(6) of the Rhode Island Fair Employment Practices Act, R.I. Gen. Laws § 28-5-1 et seq. (‘FEPA’), provide for the individual liability of an employee of a defendant employer and, if so, under what circumstances?”

For the reasons set forth…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Atascadero State Hospital v. ScanlonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Lane v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Fantini v. Salem State CollegeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  4. Reno v. BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Franconia Associates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Mancini v. City of ProvidenceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
  2. John R. Grasso v. Gina RaimondoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2018
  3. Rhode Island Truck Ctr v. Daimler Trucks North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2024
  4. Karl Olsen v. Anna L. DeMayoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2019
  5. Mancini v. City of ProvidenceDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2017

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API