Legal Opinion

Shillito v. Metropolitan Edison Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 23, 1969No. Appeal, No. 429PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Eagen,

Russell J. Shillito owns and operates a 272 acre farm in southern Cumberland County.1 On February 1, 1966, Metropolitan Edison Company (Edison) condemned a 200 foot-wide easement over the farm; the easement which was 2796 feet in length and comprised 12.8 acres was to be used for the installation of a 500 K.V. electric transmission line. Viewers were appointed and awarded damages, but Shillito appealed to the Court of Common Pleas claiming that the amount was inadequate. A jury trial ensued and damages in the amount of $40,000 plus detention damages were awarded.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Gas & Water Co. v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. A. D. Graham & Co. v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  3. Gilleland v. New York State Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Maher v. College ClubSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Genter v. Blair County Convention and Sports Facilities AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Stoner v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Visco v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Boring v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  5. Gaughen v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API