Legal Opinion · Dissent

Montgomery County v. Department of Corrections

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 22, 2005Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Judge SMITH-RIBNER.

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s interpretation of the statute at issue, Section 2(b) of the Act of July 22, 1913, P.L. 912 (1913 Act), as amended, 61 P.S. § 2151(b), as amended by Section 1 of the Act of December 20, 2000, P.L. 770 (Act 107). The majority concludes that a phrase in Section 2(b) of the 1913 Act, as amended by Act 107, requires the Commonwealth to bear the costs of the trials for all crimes and offenses committed on the grounds or within the buildings of the state penal or correctional institution, regardless of whether the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pa School Boards Ass'n, Inc. v. Com., Public Sch. Employees'retirement Bd.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Glen Alden Coal Co. v. Scranton CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Department of the Auditor General v. State Employees' Retirement SystemCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. MacElree v. Chester CountyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Department of the Auditor General v. State Employees' Retirement SystemCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API