Legal Opinion
(HC) Delacruz v. Sherman
District Court, E.D. California
Decided November 7, 2019No. 1:19-cv-00850Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GUSTAVO DELACRUZ, Case No. 1:19-cv-00850-JLT (HC) 12 Petitioner, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PETITION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED 13 v. FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST STATE REMEDIES 14 STU SHERMAN, Warden, [TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE] 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner filed a habeas petition on June 19, 2019, challenging his 2013 conviction in 18 Bakersfield County Superior Court of vehicular manslaughter. The petition appears to be 19 unexhausted; therefore, Petitioner will be ordered to show cause why it should not be dismissed…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Todd Hiivala v. Tana WoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Jackie Ervin Rasberry v. Rosie B. Garcia, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Dwayne Randall JOHNSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Carl ZENON, Respondent-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Michael T. Herbst v. Dave Cook, Director Oregon Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Peter M. Gatlin v. M.K. Madding, Warden Attorney General of the State of California People of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.