Legal Opinion

Wieder v. Miller

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 9, 1912No. Appeal, No. 128PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal, No. 128, Oct. T., 1912, by plaintiffs, from judgment of C. P. No. 4, Phila. Co., June T., 1906, No. 5,043, on certificate for defendant in case of Charles P. Wieder et al., trading as Wieder Brothers, v. Annie Miller. Assumpsit for goods sold. Before Audenried, J. The opinion of the Superior Court states the case. Certificate and judgment for plaintiffs for $134.20. Plaintiffs appealed. Error assigned was portion of charge quoted in the opinion of the Superior Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Morrison, J.,

In this action of assumpsit the plaintiffs, trading as Wieder Brothers, claimed the price and value of certain carpets, linoleum, window shades and furniture which they claimed to have sold to the defendant, Annie Miller, for the furnishing of a certain house for her. The whole amount claimed by the plaintiffs was $681.51, but the defendant testified that the contract price for the articles as agreed between Albert Wieder, one of the partners, and herself was to be $750. It appears that the defendant paid $100 on account at the time she ordered the goods; that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wills v. HardcastleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  2. Ginder v. BachmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  3. Hartman v. Pittsburg Incline Plane Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  4. Kenyon v. KenyonNew York Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Rondinella v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Steel v. SnyderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API