Legal Opinion

Golden v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided January 21, 1958No. 3 Div. 992Published

1Opinion

On Application for Rehearing

Both appellant and appellee have become applicants for a rehearing. Beyond that unanimity ceases.

The Attorney General argues that Golden’s counsel, in not calling to the court’s attention the separation seen by them during the noon recess, waived the error, since the jury was allowed to retire without a motion for a mistrial having been made by Golden.

Penney v. Grant, 16 Ala.App. 510, 79 So. 271, 272, comes nearest to supporting this view:

“ * * * But, having the knowledge in his possession, the defendant will not be permitted to speculate upon the verdict, and, if…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Craig & Co. v. Pierson Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  2. Alabama Fuel & Iron Co. v. CoursonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  3. Jones v. ColeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  4. Penney v. GrantAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API