Legal Opinion
LIKO AB v. Rise Lifts, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 15, 2008No. Civil Action 07-5302PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 15th day of December, 2008, in accordance with the rulings made during the record hearing held on December 4, 2008, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 41) is DENIED. In this Opinion, the Court provides further elaboration for denying the Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Liko AB (“Plaintiff’) brings this action against Rise Lifts, Inc., and Romedic, Inc. (collectively “Defendants”). Plaintiff manufactures, markets and sells…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered AgentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Harold Pinker, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Roche Holdings Ltd. Harold PinkerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- American Telephone And Telegraph Company v. Winback And Conserve Program, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- KDH Electronic Systems, Inc. v. Curtis Technology Ltd.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011