Legal Opinion
Ozel Conley v. Robert E. Dauer
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 27, 1972No. 71-1011PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
HUNTER, Circuit Judge.
Appellants are indigents who have been charged with violations of the criminal laws of Pennsylvania and who are unable to afford or otherwise obtain *64counsel at their preliminary hearings. They brought this § 1983 1 Civil Rights action on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated 2 against appellees, the District Attorney of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, and five City of Pittsburgh magistrates, claiming that their 6th and 14th Amendment rights as established by Coleman v. Alabama, 399 U.S. 1, 90 S.Ct. 1999, 26 L.Ed.2d 387 (1970), are being…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gonzales v. DIST. CT. IN & FOR COUNTY OF WELDSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
- United States v. WilkinsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
- Calhoun v. FoersterDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- Calhoun v. ForesterDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- Clinton v. Municipal Court of GirardDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.